![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Has it affected the pH of the effluent? When I ran a second stage, my effluent was still 6.7 (it was 6.7 going into the second stage, it was 6.7 coming out). But I didn't think to measure the tank's pH swings as a result (mind you I didn't have a nifty little chart logger like a Profilux to make it easier to do so
![]() That's awesome that you've noticed a difference already, guess there really is something to the second-stage then. Question, what is your effluent flow rate?
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Looks Great Tom. So you are still measureing PH in the first stage. have you read the PH of the effluent after the second stage?
J |
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() My PH inside the main chamber of the Calcium Reactor is 6.55 and the effluent out of the Second Stage 7.38 and the System PH is 8.20. My main lights have only been on for an hour.
Tom R |
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Really??? What's your flow-though rate (effluent rate)? I run my reactor at 6.7 and when I had two stages the second stage was emitting 6.7 as well. Although come to think of it, I think for the first week or so it was higher, but it was after several days that the second stage came down. That was at 60ml/min, so I guess it was just a case of the slow flowrate took a while for the second stage to fill up with the lower pH water.
__________________
-- Tony My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee! |
#5
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() My effluent is flowing at a rate of 100 ml per minute.
I will watch the levels over the next week and post the levels 1 week from now. Tom R |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|