![]() |
|
Portal | PhotoPost Gallery | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Victor,
I doubt the small amount of algea in your system could even put a dent in the alk. A low Calcium is probably(believe it or not)is one of the parameters i least concern myself with. Alk being at the top of the scale. Having said that i cannot explain the chemistry involved but i could say that a low alk and a high calcium is probably much more of a concern than the reverse,IME. When tested(albiet never [img]images/smiles/icon_wink.gif[/img] ),my calcium reads only in the neighborhood of 375-400+/-,yet my Sps thrive.....i think maintaining high alkalinity allows sps to metabolize(?)all elements more efficiently. In the past,when i used buffers it was totally the reverse....with kalk/buffers i could maintain calcium but not a decent alk,this resulted in a MUCH(like probably 3-4X) slower growth rate aswell as a loss of good color. At this point if anything i would even increase my alk higher and loose abit more calcium. Of course its JMVHO though,Marc. [ 30 January 2002: Message edited by: Fudge ]</p> |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|