Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2007, 05:41 AM
scuglass's Avatar
scuglass scuglass is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: calgary
Posts: 330
scuglass is on a distinguished road
Default

Personally id go longer as opposed to taller... taller just means you have to get stronger lighting and thicker glass/acrylic
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-13-2007, 05:46 AM
Pan's Avatar
Pan Pan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Didsbury
Posts: 1,137
Pan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scuglass View Post
Personally id go longer as opposed to taller... taller just means you have to get stronger lighting and thicker glass/acrylic
Yep, i remember getting soaked in my old tank, I had to hold my breath to get at the bottom. But i was more worried about do fish care if its 18-20 inches high as opposed to 24 or up..? Hmm, I hate the should i do that phase of planning a tank...if it works though i think it will look nice.
__________________
I once had a Big tank...I now have two Huskies and a coyote



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-13-2007, 05:54 AM
andresont's Avatar
andresont andresont is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Port Moody, BC.
Posts: 594
andresont is on a distinguished road
Default

Just remember that for proper gas exchange and Ph stability, you need a tank at least as wide or wider as its height. Like an ocean or a lake sort of thing.

JM2CW


~

Last edited by andresont; 09-13-2007 at 05:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-13-2007, 10:54 AM
Renegade Renegade is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 229
Renegade is on a distinguished road
Default

personally i have really like deep tank (from front to back) i like what your capable of doing with the aqua scape. You don't have to build a wall you can have real depth to it, its cool
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-13-2007, 02:03 PM
michika's Avatar
michika michika is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: YYC
Posts: 5,063
michika is on a distinguished road
Default

What do you think you want to keep for livestock? If you want say tangs, I would recommend length, but if you are going for seahorses per say, I would say height.

As for depth, I have an 18" deep tank now, and occasionally do find it challenging to find rock that will fit, yet won't be too close to the glass, or in my case, clams.

If you could do it, I would say go deeper!
__________________
+.-.+.-.+.-.+.-.+.-.+.-.+
I glue animals to rocks
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-13-2007, 02:34 PM
andrewsk's Avatar
andrewsk andrewsk is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Posts: 285
andrewsk is on a distinguished road
Default

I agree. Height should be the last choice. Length, Depth, Height. In that order.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-13-2007, 03:34 PM
DanG's Avatar
DanG DanG is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Peg City
Posts: 609
DanG is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andresont View Post
Just remember that for proper gas exchange and Ph stability, you need a tank at least as wide or wider as its height. Like an ocean or a lake sort of thing.

JM2CW


~

I didn't know that. It makes sense, but something I never thought of.

So in that case, a 90 (48 long, 18 deep and 24 tall) would be a bad plan?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-13-2007, 03:52 PM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanG View Post
I didn't know that. It makes sense, but something I never thought of.

So in that case, a 90 (48 long, 18 deep and 24 tall) would be a bad plan?

It's fine. With the amount of water movemement in a reef, evaporation from stronger lighting and having a sump and or skimmer, gas exchange isn't really an issue.
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-13-2007, 04:31 PM
fencer's Avatar
fencer fencer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ed Ab
Posts: 1,331
fencer is on a distinguished road
Default

A large shallow tank is better as you don't have to deal with having 1/2 inch plate for the tank
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-13-2007, 04:32 PM
digital-audiophile's Avatar
digital-audiophile digital-audiophile is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SE Calgary - DouglasGlen
Posts: 1,456
digital-audiophile is on a distinguished road
Default

IMo I would rather have a tank that is long and deep. Height bugs me. I am tall 6'1" but with my 90 on a stand it is a pain for me to get to the bottom of my tank and I need a little step ladder to stand on and reach to my shoulder to get to the bottom.
__________________
- Greg

90G : Light - Tek 6xT5 | Skim - EuroReef RS135 | Flow - 2xVortech MP40W | Control - Reef Keeper 2

Last edited by digital-audiophile; 09-13-2007 at 05:01 PM. Reason: Bad spelling!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.