L.E.D. vs HALIDE/T5/VHO

[sphelps]

Steve, the fact that you measured a 40% drop in par and 32% drop in LUX would suggest the two are directly related. The difference of 8% is minor considering the likely test conditions and equipment used . Anyways the point I was making as a shift in CCT (not PAR) does not necessarily mean your par has dropped, depending on the bulb and ballast it could mean an increase or a decrease in PAR meaning the two are not directly related. A decrease in PAR is simply a result of an overall decrease in intensity which could be measured in LUX. The argument was that LEDs last longer than halides because they don't suffer the CCT shift meaning a more stable PAR reading over time, I suggested this isn't the case.

Producing a standard LED replacement for fixtures is no different than any other lighting type, they've already adapted LEDs to fit into almost all standard residential applications. This is no different, first the standard is introduced and then manufacturers build fixtures to accommodate them.

Retro kits are different than fixtures but yes there are good looking and bad looking fixtures for almost everything. Currently the LED fixtures I've seen are more in the cheaper plastic look like cheaper halide and T5 fixtures, nothing really high end yet with the exception of a few module based fixtures such as the AI but the module design itself isn't visually appealing IMO. Realistically this is a very small constraint and can be easily overcome.

Most dimable or controllable lighting fixtures are based on a standard 0-10V system. While not everyone would require the ability to externally control their light fixture it should certainly be an option. One would think with the current patent on LED fixtures with built in controllers having a 0-10V plug in for an external controller would be a good thing.

Proper design of a heat sink could maximize the inductive heat transfer eliminating the need for fans. Fans are needed in the current fixtures because the heat sinks are simply standard units not designed specifically for LEDs and therefore requiring addition convective cooling. Designing the heat sink to concentrate additional surface area at the LED locations would be the first step. There are also different grades of aluminum or other materials which offer higher inductive properties than what is probably being used. Fans simply cut the cost of the heat sink dramatically which is why they are used. Eliminating the fans would actually increase quality and reliability since fans often fail or become restricted over time which could result on over heating. Also using fans will result in an uneven heat distribution meaning some LEDs will run warmer than others. These two problems could explain why fixtures have suffered from LED failure, I can't imagine any fan lasting for 10 years over a SW aquarium. Eliminating the need for fans would definitely increase reliability.

Perhaps the warranty isn't as big of an issue. Most other fixtures and equipment we use is usually limited at 1 year as well. The difference with these LED fixtures is they are new and marketed as something that will last 10 years and save you money in the long run. Manufacturers could back up these claims by offering better warranty and with a higher end fixture I would expect it to be that way but perhaps such a fixture doesn't exist yet. I wouldn't expect the warranty to cover every component but if I look at my RD pump it was marketed as an efficient quality pump designed to last longer and therefore actually save you money in the long run. It comes with a lifetime warranty on the bearings. I've had bearings fail on other pumps and while it's not the only component that can fail it still says the manufacturer is standing behind there claims and product.