Joe Reefer's Inwall 120 V2.0 (Updated) - Page 18

michika · #**171** 03-08-2008, 12:30 AM

Yeah, that is what I ment.

Delphinus · #**172** 03-08-2008, 12:35 AM

What page is the reactor picture (is there a picture of this reactor you speak of?)? I went back to page 10 and gave up. Did you make your own?

Joe Reefer · #**173** 03-08-2008, 04:46 AM

They are on this page.

Before: 30"

After: 18"

In the sump:

Delphinus · #**174** 03-08-2008, 07:53 AM

Aiyiyi! 30" tall? What kind of litre rating was it, that seems way larger than the 3l? (If so, where did you get it?

Joe Reefer · #**175** 03-08-2008, 03:16 PM

I have no idea what the liter rating was before, it was lots. I bought it off a canreefer(Drew) it was used by another guy who Drew bought it from. I am not sure what brand it is or maybe if its a DIY, but if it is DIY whoever built it has some serious skills.

mark · #**176** 03-08-2008, 03:22 PM

guess would ask why Zeo, pictures of what you have look fantastic already

digital-audiophile · #**177** 03-08-2008, 04:05 PM

Its the proline reactor. The same one I have.. allthough mine's the 1.5L version.

http://www.jlaquatics.com/phpstore/s...ct_ID=zv-0rzr2

Delphinus · #**178** 03-09-2008, 04:36 AM

I recognize it as the Proline as that's the same one I have too but mine is a 1l version (maybe 1.5l - but it just fits 1 bag). I thought it might have been a 5l model because the 3l is listed at 24" tall overall. But maybe it's the 3l version.

digital-audiophile · #**179** 03-09-2008, 04:58 AM

Are you looking at getting a bigger reactor for the new tank Tony, or are you thinking of running two smaller ones?

Joe Reefer · #**180** 03-09-2008, 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mark

guess would ask why Zeo, pictures of what you have look fantastic already

The plan was always to run Zeo, fantastic is nice and all but I want holy$&!t.