Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Polls

View Poll Results: Which would you choose?
Reactor 23 31.51%
2 Part 24 32.88%
3 Part 26 35.62%
Voters: 73. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-07-2009, 01:08 AM
Parker's Avatar
Parker Parker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,012
Parker is on a distinguished road
Default Dosing

If you had the opportunity to do it all over again what method would you choose? I'm torn on which method to use. I have a PM Calc reactor set-up that I haven't brought on-line yet, but I'm really intrigued by the 2/3 part dosing methods and the simplicity they offer.
__________________
Robb
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-07-2009, 01:11 AM
Parker's Avatar
Parker Parker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,012
Parker is on a distinguished road
Default

Whoops, should have put this in the polls section I guess..
__________________
Robb
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-07-2009, 03:51 AM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

I voted 3-part but IMO realistically 2-part and 3-part are the same thing. Big 3 being Ca, Alk and Mg .. you don't really have to dose Mg on a daily basis (or if you do it's some tiny amount compared to the other two). If you dose 2-part with something like Seachem "Reef Builder" and "Reef Advantage" (I forget which one is Ca and which one is Alk but that's what they are together), then you are already dosing Mg anyhow. If you use the Randy Holmes-Farley recipes then you have to dose Mg separately.

I dunno, Ca reactors still have their place but you said it yourself, you can't beat the simplicity of 2-part. (No CO2, no "dialing it in", no fussy regulators, etc.)
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-07-2009, 06:48 AM
whatcaneyedo's Avatar
whatcaneyedo whatcaneyedo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Prince George, BC
Posts: 2,198
whatcaneyedo is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to whatcaneyedo
Default

For me there was quite a learning curve to get the Ca Reactor all figured out. But now that I've been running one for two years I'm pretty comfortable with them. Occationally I'll turn up the flow a bit after I've done some water testing but basically I dont touch mine for months at a time.
__________________
"We shall dive down through black abysses... and in that lair of the Deep Ones we shall dwell amidst wonder and glory forever." - H.P. Lovecraft

Old 120gal Tank Journal
New 225gal Tank Journal
May 2010 TOTM
The 10th Annual Prince George Reef Tank Tour
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-07-2009, 07:18 AM
Trigger Man Trigger Man is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 802
Trigger Man is on a distinguished road
Default

I think I would do the 2 part dosing, the reactors are great as long as they are dialed in correctly, which means more work in the end.
__________________
RSM 250. Clownfish, Fox face, Blue tang, Yellow tang, Kole tang, Clown tang, Coral beauty angel, French Angel, splendid dottyback. CUC, softies, lps, sps.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-07-2009, 12:40 PM
mark's Avatar
mark mark is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 4,212
mark is on a distinguished road
Default

I voted dosing though have no problems with my reactor and they can be set and forget, but a dosing pumps with a built in controller (like here) seems interesting.

Not having run them but can see dosing being about work as a reactor; initially getting dialed-in then refilling the reservoirs. Can you just mix the solutions once (or need to be re-stirred), how often to replace the tubing, life of the motors? CO2 and aragonite easy to get an really not that pricey. Dosing mixes probably not that bad if going to littlesilvermax and making your own, but if getting into the balling methods?
__________________
my tank

Last edited by mark; 12-07-2009 at 12:43 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-09-2009, 01:32 AM
Snappy's Avatar
Snappy Snappy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 4,675
Snappy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delphinus View Post
I voted 3-part but IMO realistically 2-part and 3-part are the same thing. Big 3 being Ca, Alk and Mg .. you don't really have to dose Mg on a daily basis (or if you do it's some tiny amount compared to the other two). If you dose 2-part with something like Seachem "Reef Builder" and "Reef Advantage" (I forget which one is Ca and which one is Alk but that's what they are together), then you are already dosing Mg anyhow. If you use the Randy Holmes-Farley recipes then you have to dose Mg separately.

I dunno, Ca reactors still have their place but you said it yourself, you can't beat the simplicity of 2-part. (No CO2, no "dialing it in", no fussy regulators, etc.)
Mag should be dosed at approximately the same rate per week that alk & ca are dosed per day.
I dose about 1 liter of each ca & alk per day. I use Randy's 2 part recipe which as you mentioned is actually 3 part but it's just called two part. I also use recipe #2 because my ph is high enough already I don't need to turn the baking soda or sodium bicarbonate to "soda ash or sodium carbonate". I quite like it but can't honestly compare since I have never owned a ca reactor. (I voted 2 part)
__________________

Greg
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-09-2009, 01:50 AM
Lance's Avatar
Lance Lance is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Powell River, B.C.
Posts: 3,572
Lance is on a distinguished road
Default

Between the 225g and the 90g, I'm dosing 220ml Ca, 180ml alk and 30ml Mg per day of Randy's 2-part. I use a dosing pump for the bigger tank and dose manually on the 90g. It's quite simple this way and keeps the levels pretty constant at where I want them.
__________________
225g reef
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-09-2009, 02:24 PM
Parker's Avatar
Parker Parker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,012
Parker is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm going to go the dosing route to start and see how things go.

Where are you guys getting your chem from, are you using the DIY material (Arm & Hammer etc) or are you going with a commercial solution?
__________________
Robb
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.