Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > DIY

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-01-2004, 04:02 PM
Richer's Avatar
Richer Richer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Edmonton (Southwest), AB
Posts: 784
Richer is on a distinguished road
Default Sump Design

I'm putting together a sump for my 30 gallon tank. Here is what I'm thinking of doing:

First one:


Second one:


I was going to use a 30 gallon tank... but I couldn't get it to fit in the tank stand, so I'm using a 15 gallon tank that I had laying around.

My ultimate goal here is to eliminate micro bubbles while having the largest possible refugium. I'm probably going to put about 600gph through this sump. Which one would you choose? Any other suggestions?

Thanks!
-Richer
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-01-2004, 05:18 PM
Quinn Quinn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 2,305
Quinn is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm not sure if you want that much flow going through your fuge. I would tee off your return pump and put maybe 100 gph through the fuge. You can see how I did this:

__________________
-Quinn

Man, n. ...His chief occupation is extermination of other animals and his own species, which, however, multiplies with such insistent rapidity as to infest the whole habitable earth, and Canada. - A. Bierce, Devil's Dictionary, 1906
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-01-2004, 07:36 PM
titus's Avatar
titus titus is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 3,163
titus has disabled reputation
Default

Hello,

My personal opinion is to have water flow from one end of the sump to the other end. In other words, all overflow lines are drained into the same side of the sump. This usually maximizes the useable refugium space without the need of pumping water into a separate refugium section; and also minimizes the water flow per square inch of space, which helps to reduce bubbles from flowing into the draw chamber.

There are many fancy designs out there but the KISS rule is the best in my opinion.

Titus
__________________
A link to http://www.yahoo.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-02-2004, 06:15 PM
Richer's Avatar
Richer Richer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Edmonton (Southwest), AB
Posts: 784
Richer is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks for the ideas. I'll probably do a combination of Quinn's design idea with my second design choice. I also subscribe to the KISS rule... (thus the first design choice). However, I had simliar concerns that Quinn had... I wasn't sure if putting 600gph through a 'fuge would be a good idea.

On that note... do you think one 1" line will be enough to handle 600gph? or would it be a better idea to drill two 1" lines?

-Richer
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-03-2004, 03:20 AM
sleeman's Avatar
sleeman sleeman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Edmonton - St Albert
Posts: 175
sleeman is on a distinguished road
Default

Richer,
Not sure if you remember what my sump looked like. I put a Tee on my drain line. 1 1/2" for main drain, and teed down to 1" with a ball valve into fuge. This has all the water coming into one side of the sump, and allows me to control the amount of water going into the refugium.

Cheers,

Al
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.