Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-07-2015, 11:45 PM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default SPS and flow

So how much flow do you think your SPS tanks needs, and why do you think that?
I've been playing with flow and am questioning the Internet
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-08-2015, 12:00 AM
mikellini mikellini is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Vernon BC
Posts: 223
mikellini is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquattro View Post
So how much flow do you think your SPS tanks needs, and why do you think that?
I've been playing with flow and am questioning the Internet
Very good question. I've read many times that for SPS (and really we're talking about acropora/montipora) flow is equally as important as light.

I know I want to add more flow, currently in my DT I have around 32x/hr turnover. I'd like to double that, but my current SPS frags seem to be doing well at the moment.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-08-2015, 12:13 AM
Tn23's Avatar
Tn23 Tn23 is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 296
Tn23 is on a distinguished road
Default

I often wonder how much flow they need as well.
Tried experimenting in my frag tank and killed all the flow except the returns and they were fine for at least 5 days. It seemed as if that had no effect on the sps. However I haven't tested long term to see what happens.

Without any flow at all. Some sps start to slime up.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-08-2015, 12:41 AM
WarDog's Avatar
WarDog WarDog is offline
Darth Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Maple Ridge, BC
Posts: 3,110
WarDog will become famous soon enough
Default

Interesting question. Following for sure. I just used EcoTech's flow calculator in regards to which pump I needed... I should be good, right?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-08-2015, 12:54 AM
Chemicalguy Chemicalguy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Baden
Posts: 1
Chemicalguy is on a distinguished road
Default

I have killed sps putting direct flow onto it , so I now keep direct flow away from sps and have the current just pass the piece .
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-08-2015, 01:18 AM
mrhasan's Avatar
mrhasan mrhasan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,893
mrhasan is on a distinguished road
Default

I have used a wp 40 and a wp 20 synced at full speed in my 70 gallon and the corals sure loved it. That's before wp40 died and the wp20 seems to keep the corals happy.
__________________

You wouldn't want to see my tank. I don't use fancy equipment and I am a noob
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-08-2015, 02:18 AM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Why I ask is that after adding the Moorish Idol, I noticed he wasn't happy with a million times turnover in the tank. So I've knocked the flow down about 70% and notice that all the movement in the corals (LPS and SPS polyps) remain the same. The food added flows the same, and overall, I can't see how the lower flow would negatively impact the tank. I always baste the rock once a week, and that too is still going down the overflow.

Now, my tank is mostly frags and small colonies. I can see needing to increase flow once I have full colonies, simply because they will diffuse flow. But overall, moving from (up to ) 100x turnover to maybe 30x seems to make little difference.

I'm adding a school of blue eyed cardinals shortly, and I have read that they didn't do well with flow found in typical acro dominated tanks. So I'm just thinking, maybe typical isn't based on anything real??

I do know that increased flow results in thicker and more solid growth. So once I start seeing substantial growth, I will adjust flow up if I notice spindley growth patterns happening.

Just a thought
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-08-2015, 02:52 AM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

I always thought water velocity and the shape of the water flow / cone / whatever was the more important thing to get right. I've always kind of thought the "must have moar turnover" school of thought was kind of silly in much the same way it was silly to speak in terms of "watts per gallon" 15 years ago when we talked about lighting.

Your plan seems more or less legit to me. FWIW.
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-08-2015, 02:53 AM
trilinearmipmap trilinearmipmap is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Prince Rupert B.C.
Posts: 1,213
trilinearmipmap is on a distinguished road
Default

I've not decided between 2 options:

(1) The maximum possible flow tolerated by the corals, to basically eliminate the static barrier layer (analagous to insulation) of water around the surface of each coral, to maximize diffusion from the coral to the tank water and vice versa.

(2) Enough flow so that every SPS coral everywhere in the tank gets some flow. Ie. there may be excessive flow in some areas of the tank, to ensure that there are no "dead" areas or areas of low flow.

I am doing option (1) but have had edges of some corals killed when too near a powerhead. I have a feeling option (2) is correct, which is why the Maxspect gyre seems interesting - it would ensure flow everywhere in the tank without excessive flow in any one area.

The other option I thought about was just brief periods of very high flow, such as a minute of high flow every 15 minutes, might experiment with that.
__________________
120 gallon sps/anemones/LPS reef since 2004
Apex controller
8 x 54 watt T5 PowerModule
Herbie's silent overflow system
Jebao DC 12000 return pump
Jecod CP-40 Cross-flow circulation device
Mini Bubble King 180
Barr Aquatics calcium reactor
Bucket fuge
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-08-2015, 03:07 AM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

I guess I'm currently sitting at option 2. I just sat in front of the tank and looked at all areas, and all get "sufficient" flow, with some maybe getting too much. It appears that all, even with option 2, have enough flow to break that barrier, if there is a barrier, and it can be broken
But all polyps out, all moving well, and sand (mostly) staying on the bottom. I think I can move pumps around a bit, and maybe even lower a bit further. I don't think the cardinals will like it now
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.