Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Product Review and Equipment Forum > Pump Specific

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-07-2013, 03:02 PM
mrhasan's Avatar
mrhasan mrhasan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,893
mrhasan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mike31154 View Post
For the average home owner, the power company loses with respect to PF, not the consumer. Pretty certain that large industrial customers are billed extra when their equipment includes many large inductive loads such as AC motors.
My logic is, even if the PF is included in their calculation, it got to be the pf of the whole house and not the individual motor. Generally, that gets to above 0.9.
__________________

You wouldn't want to see my tank. I don't use fancy equipment and I am a noob
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-07-2013, 03:03 PM
mrhasan's Avatar
mrhasan mrhasan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,893
mrhasan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
While the pump is pulling 1.8A it's not using it all, essentially most of it is going back to the grid so to speak.
That's only applicable in some microgeneration programs. You are pulling out 1.8A through the pump and hence its yours. And more or less, the whole current is consumed by the motor other than some leakages.
__________________

You wouldn't want to see my tank. I don't use fancy equipment and I am a noob
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-07-2013, 03:16 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrhasan View Post
http://www.enmax.com/Power/Tariffs/P...or/default.htm

This might help you a bit for now. My colleague is still not here and I am not sure how Alberta is billed with PF like whether they consider any ratio or just unity pf in the grid. I will get the info from him and confirm the ratio.
That sounds like its only applied to commercial use, being billed based on kVA and not kW.

Last edited by sphelps; 03-07-2013 at 03:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-07-2013, 03:23 PM
mrhasan's Avatar
mrhasan mrhasan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,893
mrhasan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
That sounds like its only applied to commercial use, being billed based on kVA and not kW.
I am still confused about those components. Will get to you with the right stuff.

Electric companies will not be able to determine individual PF of all the devices and hence, even if they use any PF it is going to be an average of the whole house or just unity factor. I will get back to you after 12pm or something regarding this. My prof should be the best person to clear it up
__________________

You wouldn't want to see my tank. I don't use fancy equipment and I am a noob
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-07-2013, 03:32 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Thanks let me know

I can't tell you how ****ed I'll be if this pump is actually costing me over 200W of power.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-07-2013, 03:35 PM
mrhasan's Avatar
mrhasan mrhasan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,893
mrhasan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
Thanks let me know

I can't tell you how ****ed I'll be if this pump is actually costing me over 200W of power.
Easiest solution: move to DC motors. :P

I talked with a friend of mine from montreal and he said you are going to be billed for 1.85 * 115 * number of operating hours, theoretically. I will keep you updated
__________________

You wouldn't want to see my tank. I don't use fancy equipment and I am a noob
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-07-2013, 03:44 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Well this is looking awesome, 65 Watt max stamped right on the $700 pump, meanwhile it's using over 200 Watts.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-07-2013, 03:46 PM
mrhasan's Avatar
mrhasan mrhasan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 2,893
mrhasan is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sphelps View Post
Well this is looking awesome, 65 Watt max stamped right on the $700 pump, meanwhile it's using over 200 Watts.
Hold on no need to get excited about it I haven't confirmed it yet.
__________________

You wouldn't want to see my tank. I don't use fancy equipment and I am a noob
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-07-2013, 03:49 PM
sphelps's Avatar
sphelps sphelps is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Lyalta, East of Calgary
Posts: 4,777
sphelps is on a distinguished road
Default

Hurry up, the large hammer I'm holding above the pump is getting heavy
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-07-2013, 04:01 PM
mike31154's Avatar
mike31154 mike31154 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vernon
Posts: 2,073
mike31154 will become famous soon enough
Default

Nothing to confirm if you've measured consumption at 200 watts, other than what's stamped on the motor is evidently false info....
__________________
Mike
77g sumpless SW
DIY 10 watt multi-chip LED build http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=82206
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.