Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-20-2010, 05:09 PM
vaporize vaporize is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 128
vaporize is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to vaporize
Default

I have one Olympus Stylus and another Olympus W560 (on sale at $89.99 at SIG - http://www.sigelectronics.com/SIG/Ol...4Pa38Ta38Oa3n0) .

The Stylus takes much nicer pictures and with macro shots functions on some. The $89.99 is exactly what it is, a cheaper POS camera with underwater function, useful but the quality definitely degrades alot comparing to the Stylus (but it's cheap at $89.99).

I think comparing to my Canon normal A720 POS, the Canon is by far much much better auto-focus and takes nicer pictures (even the Canon is like 2 years older I think). This one is not water proof or anything, just speaking about picture quality.
__________________
Clownfish Collection: Normal Ocellaris, Black Ocellaris, Stubby Ocellaris, Tequillia Sunrise Ocellaris,
Red Sea, Black Saddleback, Brown Camel, Orange Fin, Melanistic Clarkii, Common Clarkii, True Percula, True Picassco, Pink Skunk, Orange Skunk, Maldives Clown, TRUE Sebae clown, Akin Clown, Gold Striped Maroon, White Striped Maroon, Latezonatus
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-20-2010, 06:03 PM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

I looked at those exact 2 myself. I can't remember what specifically pushed me to the D10, it was either cost or maybe the 8000 hadn't been released quite yet when I was looking (and I sort of needed it right away as I was going on a trip a week later where I would be diving). Hard to go wrong with either Olympus or Canon in my opinion though so pick the one that feels nicer in your hand. I love my D10, I take it everywhere. The goofy shape doesn't bother me, it's still small enough to fit in my pocket.

The only thing I wish the D10 did is shoot HD video. I don't think the 8000 will either, though. If memory serves, specification-wise they are pretty equivalent cameras. I think..

Anyhow I doubt you can go wrong with either.
Quote:
Originally Posted by milkton View Post
im kinda deciding on whether to get the olympic stylus 8000 or the canon d10, or any other waterproof camera. I hear better things about the canon d10, but i dont like its odd shape and color. Anyone out there that can simplify the choices for me (us)??
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-21-2010, 12:34 AM
milkton milkton is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3
milkton is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

alright thanks for the advice, and once again im still leaning towards the d10. fencer and gongshow brought up the panasonic lumix ts2 and i was kinda wondering about that camera as well, i'v heard it takes 14mp pics and has water, sand, shock, freeze, etc. proof as well. Although a bit more pricey than the d10 and stylus, anyone given that a try??
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-23-2010, 04:48 AM
fLshgear fLshgear is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Calgary, varsity NW
Posts: 12
fLshgear is on a distinguished road
Default

check out http://www.dpreview.com/news/0902/09021805canond10.asp

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q209...roup/page5.asp



dpreview is a great site for comparison and just general info on cameras and accessories

you can do side by side comparison under buying guide
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 08-26-2010, 04:19 PM
Namnuta Namnuta is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Calgary,Alberta Canada
Posts: 39
Namnuta is on a distinguished road
Default

I used to use a Canon A610 with dive enclosure. But i recently upgraded to a Canon G11 and have the enclosure on order. The G11 takes amazing pictures. Enclosure is good to 130ft, and cost me $200 usd.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 08-26-2010, 05:25 PM
saltcreep's Avatar
saltcreep saltcreep is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: on the edge
Posts: 230
saltcreep is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Namnuta View Post
I used to use a Canon A610 with dive enclosure. But i recently upgraded to a Canon G11 and have the enclosure on order. The G11 takes amazing pictures. Enclosure is good to 130ft, and cost me $200 usd.
+1

The major factor in your decision is what the intended use will be. If you are intending for quite a bit of underwater use but are wanting a land camera, I would highly recommend going with the G11 and a proper underwater housing. You can never be too careful (ask my wife about our camera).

I'm eyeing the new Sealife DC1200 for an upcoming trip. Mantas and whale sharks....hopefully.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 08-26-2010, 07:30 PM
NanoHuman's Avatar
NanoHuman NanoHuman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 40
NanoHuman is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to NanoHuman
Default

Buying a point and shoot and a underwater housing is the best thing to do.

Sony makes excellent housings for some of its point and shoot lines, some of which come with software that can automatically filter so you get proper pictures without having to use a orange colored lens cover.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 09-17-2010, 01:57 AM
spawn spawn is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: calgary
Posts: 515
spawn is on a distinguished road
Default

Hey how's it going. What setting's are you using to get fair-good quality in tank photo's? I've got the same camera, but it's real tough to get any good color or in-focus shot's. I've played around with it quite a bit. I did get some sweet shot's and video diving in the Dominican, (Boring Diving)max depth on dive was 48' for 32 min. No problems with the camera, apparently there is a case you can get for it to go deeper. I was nervous @ that depth, but kept filming anyway to keep up with the group.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.