Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-10-2015, 05:30 AM
acepumping's Avatar
acepumping acepumping is offline
Thinks he can get Mods fired
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: langley
Posts: 234
acepumping is on a distinguished road
Default

I was told by someone that 6x your tank rate is the range you want to be in..
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-10-2015, 05:34 AM
SeaHorse_Fanatic SeaHorse_Fanatic is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 4,880
SeaHorse_Fanatic will become famous soon enough
Default

I've always been a believer in slower flow through sump for longer dwelling time and greater flow provided by powerheads as well.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-10-2015, 06:10 AM
eli@fijireefrock.com's Avatar
eli@fijireefrock.com eli@fijireefrock.com is offline
Vendor
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: calgary
Posts: 1,758
eli@fijireefrock.com is on a distinguished road
Default

I think I might be the one that likes the higher turnover,actually it all depends on why the high flow or the low flow,I could tell you why the high in my case.
1st its at low end 7000glns/hr turnover that is about 17 times (as my main display at roughly 400glns)
Running that in conjunction with 2 X Jebao WP60 one on either side to give me waves of almost 2" high from top to bottom of the tank with the turnover outlet location near one and enhances the flow throughout the tank leaving no room for dead spot in any section of my tank.
I run 2 frag tanks and 3 sumps that are all fed and split at different flow rate directly from my overflow box (so to say one pump runs flow throughout my entire system) that gives me dwelling time for each tank and sumps (one sump 5 foot loaded with rubble and act as criptic) another strictly for my carbon and skimmer, one that holds the water and removes all the crud from the water line and the last for filter floss that runs 24hr prior to water changes and back to the main tank.

Call me old school or crazy but it worked for me in years with no issues and I believe if it isn't broke why fix it.
Another belief of mine is that everyones main tank is loaded with fish, fish poop, mixed corals,coral slime and all types of bacteria and to top things high lighting to promote growth in all aspect why leave the water on low turnover when you can keep it cleaner with other means through the sump.(skimmer,carbon,floss,maybe GFO,socks,...)
I have seen tanks with low turnover maybe 5-7 times with more problems than not.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-10-2015, 01:46 PM
reefwars reefwars is offline
R.I.P.
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 6,186
reefwars will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eli@fijireefrock.com View Post

Call me old school or crazy but it worked for me in years with no issues and I believe if it isn't broke why fix it.
Another belief of mine is that everyones main tank is loaded with fish, fish poop, mixed corals,coral slime and all types of bacteria and to top things high lighting to promote growth in all aspect why leave the water on low turnover when you can keep it cleaner with other means through the sump.(skimmer,carbon,floss,maybe GFO,socks,...)
I have seen tanks with low turnover maybe 5-7 times with more problems than not.


The idea of the turnover rate is that a protein skimmer has a pump that draws water at a set speed , the pump has a rating which means it can only draw so much water ever , so pushing water past the skimmer faster then it can draw only makes the skimmer less efficient not skim more water. Skimmer pumps don't pull that kind of wat and lucky to be a fraction of that. So what we intended to remove simpy goes back to display

Now if a guy says i want to run more water through my sump say for more water to pass through the filter floss or socks then fine......but I would suggest more filtration in the way of more floss or double socks (yes you can double socks) vs more water.

Having water flow by heaters with less contact time will allow heaters to work harder as well thus having them run more ( a stagnant pool wil warm faster then a flowing river)

I dont see how pushing more water through the sump would clean any faster than pushing less wat would.


There's a good article on advanced aquarist I'll see if I can dig up that talks about turnover rates.

So does this mean a tank will have issues or even be unsuccessful .....no of course not but it's like buying a skimmer for a 100g system that's rated to 125g vs buying one rated for 175g ......might not make a huge diff but nothing wrong with getting the most bang for your buck right?

When we talk about medias that bind then yes more water through the phosphate reactor will result in more efficiency and same for carbon , how ever most people with larger tanks aren't using gravity to feed there gfo or carbon.
__________________
........
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-10-2015, 01:49 PM
reefwars reefwars is offline
R.I.P.
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 6,186
reefwars will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by acepumping View Post
I was told by someone that 6x your tank rate is the range you want to be in..
This is also what I tell people , it comes from the fact that most skimmer on the market use similar sized pumps obviously everyone has slightly different sizes but overall not to drastic in diff so a ballpark figure of around 6x was developed. This was beat to death on RC and the result was the above number
__________________
........
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-01-2015, 08:29 PM
MitchM's Avatar
MitchM MitchM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Water Valley, AB
Posts: 1,280
MitchM is on a distinguished road
Default

I'm on the lower end of the scale, 2X turnover.
I don't understand why people are talking about dwell time in a skimmer and sump turnover rate. They're 2 different things aren't they?

Turnover rate is what your sump return pump is running at and dwell time has to do with the height and water throughput of your protein skimmer. Correct me if I'm wrong.

I prefer as low of a sump turnover rate as possible, while maintaining healthy water parameters in the display tank. I actively feed my corals and don't like the idea of having the food filtered out soon after I add it.
I keep on top of the tank parameters by measuring phosphorus and nitrate levels, weekly for now.
__________________
Mitch

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-01-2015, 09:34 PM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MitchM View Post
I don't understand why people are talking about dwell time in a skimmer and sump turnover rate. They're 2 different things aren't they?
Dwell time in sump near skimmer, vs dwell time of contact in skimmer. Not sure it matters, dwell vs turnover in the big scheme of things, but lower sump turnover is silent for me, so I go with it
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-01-2015, 09:46 PM
MitchM's Avatar
MitchM MitchM is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Water Valley, AB
Posts: 1,280
MitchM is on a distinguished road
Default

Yes, dead silent for me too. Close to the bed so major consideration.

To me a skimmer is just another type of filter that gets it's feed from the sump.
I also use a 10 micron sock for Fozdown and a 200 micron sock from the display tank overflow.
That's it.
__________________
Mitch

Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-01-2015, 11:47 PM
Skimmin's Avatar
Skimmin Skimmin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Banff
Posts: 254
Skimmin is on a distinguished road
Default

Yah I have a recirc skimmer so Im not worried about my skimmer at all. At this point my dt is maintaining the same temperature as my sump so I feel I have enough flow. I would just like a little more to help with clarity a little which is just more flow through my filter socks. Either way Im gonna leave it for now and if the tank runs well with no problem algae or nitrates I'm not gonna worry about it. I do have so great pod and macro growth in my fuge. Not sure if thats due to low flow though.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-02-2015, 02:20 AM
Aquattro's Avatar
Aquattro Aquattro is offline
Just a guy..
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 18,053
Aquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the roughAquattro is a jewel in the rough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skimmin View Post
if the tank runs well
that there is the perfect reason to leave things alone!!
__________________
Brad
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.