Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Reef

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-15-2015, 10:10 PM
gobytron gobytron is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 1,424
gobytron is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by asylumdown View Post
It's probably not a well accepted theory, but cyano bacteria has a disproportionately high demand for iron, and they've evolved family specific pathways to harvest it from the environment called siderophores that might be able to pick up the form of iron found in GFO. Research around shipwrecks and black reefs have recently shown a strong correlation between the grounding/sinking of iron based ships, and the rapid decline of surrounding reefs as simple algaes like cyano over-take corals. A recent paper linked it directly to the iron rusting out the hull.

There are also half cocked plans to dump enormous amounts of iron in the open ocean to encourage phytoplankton as a form of carbon sequestration. A great deal of the phytoplankton in the ocean is free living Cyanobacteria. Different genera than the kind on your sand bed, but the kinds we deal with have many of the same needs and capabilities.

Anyway it's clearly more complex, and there's more to cyano outbreaks than just iron, but I have anecdotally experienced drastic changes in its behavior just by starting or stopping the use of GFO. I use PO4x4 now, which isn't granulated, it's polymer encapsulated. Produces zero dust and theoretically releases less iron in to the water column. It's expensive as all get out, but I haven't had any issues with cyano since.
This is the kind of post that gets me off the classifieds.

Thanks for sharing this.

In my last 95 gallon, I had immense issues with HA, which I dealt with in many ways...once it was significantly reduced, I started running BRS GFO...

The BAM cyano like crazy...almost to the point that it was as bad as my HA was.

Even Chemi clean didn't work.

So at least to me, that theory holds some weight.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-15-2015, 10:27 PM
martinmcnally martinmcnally is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 600
martinmcnally is on a distinguished road
Default

I started using GFO after having non stop phosphate problems with a previous tank. I put it down to the old rock. It came from an older fish only tank with very poor lighting. It seems the phosphate was leaching out of the rock for years. Water changes would not reduce it. The only way I was ever able to get it under control was with the GFO. I am guessing if I reduced it now I would not have as much of a problem.

Are there other viable alternatives? I am building an algae scrubber at the moment actually. That might enable me to get rid of the GFO from what I hear from other peoples experience.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-15-2015, 10:35 PM
gobytron gobytron is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Coquitlam, BC
Posts: 1,424
gobytron is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

asylumdown mentions PO4x4
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-16-2015, 01:58 AM
Myka's Avatar
Myka Myka is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Saskatoon, SK.
Posts: 11,268
Myka will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martinmcnally View Post
Your right l should get a new bigger tank haha.

It's about 2 years old the rock is much older. If I increase the flow anymore it whips up the sand
Haha good plan!! I don't mean increase the flow, I mean adjust the rockwork so that the flow can get around the rock better. It looks like it has a lot of areas for it to settle. Your tank looks older than 2 years. I guess you're good at growing corals.
__________________
~ Mindy

SPS fanatic.

Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 05-17-2015, 08:00 PM
Northvan Northvan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Vancouver,BC
Posts: 34
Northvan is on a distinguished road
Default Unkillable cyano

We feel your pain. We've been fighting it for a year. We've done chemiclean (temporey improvement, but comes back), 3 days lights out with tank wrapped (no improvement at all), just finished a bottle of cyano clean with coral snow (1 month, $120, actually seems to have gotten worse).
We haven't yet tried erythromycin (antibacterial), not sure how to dose it.
Tank is almost no fun anymore.
Cyano sucketh .
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-18-2015, 09:40 PM
martinmcnally martinmcnally is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Red Deer
Posts: 600
martinmcnally is on a distinguished road
Default

My cyano is completely gone now however it wasnt straightforward with the chemiclean.

I did the first clean as per the manual, basically everything off with an airstone running for 2 days. However after the 2 days I wasn't satisfied so I went another day. Removing the chemiclean seemed easy, 1 water change plus carbon and the skimmer was running again within a few hours.

However the cyano wasn't gone just reduced. I waited a week or 2 and did another 3 day treatment. This time was vastly different. The cyano was completely gone after 3 days. However removing it from the water was much more difficult. It took 3 water changes, new carbon and allowing the skimmer to overflow for around 10 days before it returned to normal and started skimming again.

Much harder on the second run than I thought but its gone and the chemiclean appeared to have no affect on coral or fish.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.