Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board  

Go Back   Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board > General > Marine Fish

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-12-2012, 02:30 AM
Salt2Death Salt2Death is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Whitecourt Ab
Posts: 182
Salt2Death is on a distinguished road
Default UV sterilizer.... Is it worth it to run?

Never have, been on the fence about it and not sure if that's the best use of funds......

What's your opinions?

My sump today....


Sent Via The Pirate Ship...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-12-2012, 04:01 AM
Delphinus's Avatar
Delphinus Delphinus is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Posts: 12,896
Delphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura aboutDelphinus has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via MSN to Delphinus
Default

My opinion is a solid "it depends."

Here's my take on it. If nothing else, UV will break down the organic compounds in the water that tend to cause the water to get that yellow tinge to it, and then this can be skimmed out. So if nothing else, a UV *can* polish the water up some. The water will have a noticeably brighter or clearer look to it.

To actually have UV act as an anti pathogenic tool you need a fairly large unit. I have one myself, think it's a 57w unit, that I keep onhand in case I ever get a bad ich outbreak. When I ran it in the past it did help keep it at bay (not a silver bullet, but it did make a difference with fish that had really bad ich and they were able to overcome it in the end). Anything 20w or less is probably not going to work for this although it will still help polish the water.

Like anything however there are pros and cons. For example, the glass tube the light sits in will need regular cleaning (some units have a built in wiper but not all). Like any light, the UV lamp itself will lose intensity and will need replacing. If you run it 24/7 you will probably need to replace it as soon as 6 months. Maybe longer if you don't run it 24/7 but if you're going for the anti pathogen effect I would imagine you need it on 24/7.

HTH
__________________
-- Tony
My next hobby will be flooding my basement while repeatedly banging my head against a brick wall and tearing up $100 bills. Whee!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-12-2012, 04:35 AM
gregzz4's Avatar
gregzz4 gregzz4 is offline
On Hiatus
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Burnaby, B.C.
Posts: 4,890
gregzz4 will become famous soon enough
Default

I agree with Tony on a lot of points

I find running a UV unit is a lot of 'feel good'
I run mine at a low enough flow to be beyond the 'green algae' control and closer to 'bug' control

I only change my bulbs once a year and, with the Pentair Lifeguard unit I own, will need to change the inner sleeve every 2 years or so as UV breaks down plastics

It's still only a 'bandaid' for a lot of issues and is best used as a water clarifier, with it plumbed into your system after your filtration to be the most effective

There's lots of good info on the web pertaining to UV flow rates
I use the info here for a guide
Specifically, this excerpt:
*As a Clarifier; For Algae Control (Green Water and some Cloudy Water), 40-50 gph per watt is effective to maintain effective exposure for effective UVC sterilization/radiation (depending on model UV’s design).
High Efficiency (High Dwell/Exposure) UV Sterilizers such as the TMC Pond Advantage with long contact time as per the wattage and lamp can easily run as high as 50-60 gph per watt. The even higher efficiency (& dwell time) Pro Clear UV 30 can go 70+ gph per watt.

*As a Sterilizer; Generally for bacterial control (& many virus) a flow rate of 20-25 gph per watt (75-95 liters per hour, per watt), sometimes as high as 30-35 gph per watt for high efficiency UV Sterilizers such as the TMC Vecton UV.

*As a Sterilizer; For single cell parasite control (such as Cryptocaryon) as well as a few “stubborn” viruses, a flow under 10 gph (or even less) is necessary. This is often not 100% for all parasites of this type, so a UV Sterilizer should not be relied on as the sole preventative for these parasites!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-12-2012, 02:58 PM
Salt2Death Salt2Death is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Whitecourt Ab
Posts: 182
Salt2Death is on a distinguished road
Default

I have never used one- I like all the info but it seems its more beneficial to keep my filtration at its best.
My double up my reactors 2 carbon 2 GFO instead.


Sent Via The Pirate Ship...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-12-2012, 03:19 PM
mexxedm's Avatar
mexxedm mexxedm is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: edmonton
Posts: 53
mexxedm is on a distinguished road
Default It's worth it

I had a UV sterilizer in my tank. There was no algae and the water is super clean. It stops working. I did not get a replacement. My tank now has green hair algae.
From my experience, it's worth it.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-12-2012, 03:30 PM
xenon's Avatar
xenon xenon is offline
Vendor
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Mississauga, ON
Posts: 912
xenon is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to xenon
Default

I got a properly sized UV (40watt Emperor Aquatics) for my setup and I can assure you it does make a difference.

I originally got it to help my fish beat velvet (and it worked) but I also noticed less film on my glass and my skimmer is pulling out more gunk than ever before.

I am able to maintain low NO3/PO4 without using carbon or GFO so far. LOVE IT!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-12-2012, 05:07 PM
msjboy msjboy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: burnaby
Posts: 268
msjboy is on a distinguished road
Default

sort of read, if you are doing more fish than corals tank, it is a good thing to have. However, if there are more corals, macro algage tanks, you would want to prevent kill off of food such as pods/ plankton life etc. I think a lot of setups you see on the other forums ( eg. nano-reef, reefsanctuary ) people don't use it anymore.

msjboy
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-12-2012, 05:30 PM
phreezee phreezee is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Calgary NW
Posts: 192
phreezee is on a distinguished road
Default

As a sterilizer or clarifier, I prefer ozone as a better use of funds. It has its cons, but you can't beat its effectiveness.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.