View Single Post
  #26  
Old 04-22-2011, 12:49 PM
nlreefguy nlreefguy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: St. John's, NL
Posts: 295
nlreefguy is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueWorldAquatic View Post
If money is an issue, get A nac6. For the $50 more I would get a nac7, cone skimmers are much more efficient.

If footprint is important, the nac6 will fit in more places than the nac7
I wasn't aware that this had been proven so definitively re: cone skimmers. My impression was that recent research is showing no significant difference between cone and cylindircal skimmers.

http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2010/1/aafeature
Reply With Quote