View Single Post
  #14  
Old 09-01-2005, 08:47 PM
dirtyreefer's Avatar
dirtyreefer dirtyreefer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 299
dirtyreefer is on a distinguished road
Default Re: reply

Quote:
Originally Posted by danny zubot
Good info, I can't quite justify a calcium reactor yet because I've only got 80 gallons total volume.

Please answer: Best bang for your buck for maintaining calcium levels?

1. Kalk
2. Calcium suppliment
Definitely Kalk since you wouldn't have to maintain Alk either (as long as your Kalk dosing can keep up with your evap rate).
Reply With Quote