Stunning images of planet Earth surrounded by space garbage
 

http://english.pravda.ru/photo/report/garbage-3353/0/

About 4,600 launches have been made since the first launch of Earth's man-made satellite in 1957. Nowadays, there are about 6,000 artificial satellites orbiting the planet

http://english.pravda.ru/img/idb/photo/3-1799.jpg

Can that be a photo? Wouldn't you have on the moon to get that much perspective and that wide an angle? Would you be able to see space junk from that far away?

pravda.ru is like the equivalent of the national inquirer online...
Have a look at some of their other content, lots of embellishment and fluff.

I.E, some of those pieces of space junk would be bigger than my house, maybe even than Coquitlam...

Is this not the shot of Earth from Wall-E the Movie.

Chris

+1

but give us a few years, we're definitely on the right track to make this a reality.

im sure it will happen eventually, but this photo is just... ridiculous. satellites are not the size of cities.

What no clouds? I guess they all huddled together on the other side.
Here's a more interesting real image:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap070916.html

That's an amazing picture!! I found this one on this site as well

Does anyone know the explanation as to why sometimes the moon apprears so much closer or larger than other times?

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ima...oMoon_seip.jpg

The reason is good Photography.

:lol:

Anyone else look at this picture and start singing the Discovery Channel song or is it just me?

Boom-di-ada / Boom-di-ada

That commercial makes me smile!!!

Moon illusion, the moon always seems larger in angular size when it is near the horizon than when it is high in the sky. In addition the moon does vary in angular size due to the eccentricity of its orbit. When the moon is closest to earth it obviously appears larger.

I saw my missing screw driver out there.

[quote=Keri
Does anyone know the explanation as to why sometimes the moon apprears so much closer or larger than other times? [/QUOTE]

Read the caption below the photograph in this link:
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap071025.html
Sphelps has the right answer as well.

Thanks! I remember someone giving me an explanation years ago but I couldn't remember it, that's it :)