![]()  | 
	
		
 reply 
		
		
		I had more options including bare bottom on the poll but when I posted it excluded a couple of them. :confused:  
	Its interesting to see everone's opinion on sand beds as far as being an esthetic or functional part of our aquariums. I can't remember which magazine I read this in and my numbers might be slightly off but 75% to 80% of anoxic denitrification occure within the top 3/4 of and inch of the sand bed. I guess I'll be satisfied with my 1.5 to 2 inches.  | 
		
 Re: reply 
		
		
		Quote: 
	
 for what it is worth I was one who jumped on the DSB bandwagon as it was all the rage when I was starting up. I started with 6 to 8" depth then about 1 year later I started having algae problems and other problems that I couldn't explain. I moved and removed all the sand except for 1/2 an inch and the problems went away. now the only reason I want to go totally bare bottom is so I can increase the flow in the tank through out the whole tank to aid in detritus removal. Steve  | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 -Richer  | 
		
 "O" 
	and my fat 3yr. old mandarin is just fine. :biggrin:  | 
		
 reply 
		
		
		Quote: 
	
  | 
		
 1.5" - 2".  Makes my yellow watchman happy :biggrin: & I get more biodiversity. 
	 | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 Steve  | 
		
 At least, not where they're digging. 
	 | 
		
 Quote: 
	
 Steve  | 
		
 Well mine must not have read your posts because it mostly eats the frz. mysis, b.s., and blood worms.  When I look in the tank after the main lights are out, I can see literally 100s of live mysis, copepods & arthopods crawling around.  I seeded the tank with OA's live sand & there's lots of LR & different macroalgae for the "bugs" to hide in.  So as long as he doesn't sneak on my computer at night and check out your posts, he'll stay fat & happy & I'll keep my biodiversity :lol:  :biggrin:   Let's here it for illiterate fish :exclaim:  :razz: 
	 | 
| All times are GMT. The time now is 03:17 PM. | 
	Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.