BMW Rider
03-21-2006, 02:31 AM
I would like you opinions and experiences with either PC or VHO actinic lighting.
I have been using 2 x 96w PC actinics along with my MHs for the past two years. I have not been experiencing great success with the PC bulbs. I am averaging bulb failure in under six months, sometimes in as little as three. I'm getting a bit tired of the expense of these bulbs usually around $50 - 60 each plus shipping, I've tried several brands and none seem to last any better that the other. I was checking, and I can run VHOs with the PFO electronic ballast that I have, and would like to know if these are any better than the PCs. I figure even if they don't last any longer, at least they are about half the price to replace. of course I'd have to replace the sockets, but that would be a one time cost that would make the VHOs equal to the cost of the PCs. After that they would be cheaper.
Comments please.
I have been using 2 x 96w PC actinics along with my MHs for the past two years. I have not been experiencing great success with the PC bulbs. I am averaging bulb failure in under six months, sometimes in as little as three. I'm getting a bit tired of the expense of these bulbs usually around $50 - 60 each plus shipping, I've tried several brands and none seem to last any better that the other. I was checking, and I can run VHOs with the PFO electronic ballast that I have, and would like to know if these are any better than the PCs. I figure even if they don't last any longer, at least they are about half the price to replace. of course I'd have to replace the sockets, but that would be a one time cost that would make the VHOs equal to the cost of the PCs. After that they would be cheaper.
Comments please.